Johann Drops a Blog

Random ramblings from an idiot

Taking one’s ball and going home… or something like that

Looks like the King of Allegedly (Though Everyone On The Planet Knows They Are) Tainted Homeruns is spouting off again. Douchebag.

Courtesy of today’s Journal-Register Sports Flash page:

COOPERSTOWN, N.Y. — The clock isn’t ticking yet on his Hall of Fame candidacy, but Barry Bonds already is making waves in Cooperstown.

The former Giants slugger and current major league home run king said Thursday night on MSNBC that he will not participate in any future Hall of Fame events, including his own induction ceremony, if the Hall displays his 756th home run ball — which will be emblazoned with an asterisk by its current owner.

The ball, which Bonds hit for a home run on Aug. 7 to break Hank Aaron’s all-time record, was retrieved by New Yorker Matt Murphy, then put up for auction, where fashion designer Marc Ecko bought it. Ecko held an online vote to ask fans what to do with the ball, and the fans chose to have Ecko put an asterisk on it and then donate it to the Hall of Fame.

The ball has yet to arrive in Cooperstown.

First off, one of the biggest issues I have in general here is simply that the idiot Hall of Fame voters unfortunately will wind up voting this jag-off into the HoF. That, in and of itself, is a tragedy and an affront to the game. But that’s another argument.

I heard a little more about this “story” on ESPN Radio the other night. Seems Mr. Ever-Expanding Hat Size went all third person on whomever was interviewing him, and when he was asked that even if he gets inducted, he won’t show, Roid Boy said “Barry Bonds will not be there”.

So tell me… other than the fact that he will someday be elected to the HoF, what is the negative part of this story? Um, there isn’t one. Tainted or not, I do, oddly enough, agree that his “record-breaking”* ball should be in the Hall. That being said, it absolutely should have the asterisk on it. If that pisses him off enough that he won’t ever go or won’t even attend his own induction, that’s like getting 11 McNuggets in a 10-piece meal, as far as I’m concerned. Oooooh- bonus!!

See, Bonds still just doesn’t get it–or else he’s still in denial. Whether right or wrong (it’s right), he will forever be the poster boy for the Steroid Era of baseball. There were “Mike McGwire and Sammy Sooser” (bonus points to the first person who correctly identifies who butchered their names like that in 1998) who, like Bonds, have never actually been “proven” to have used (yet, also like Bonds), but considering their absolutely pathetic showings on Capitol Hill a couple years back, especially McGwire, it’s pretty obvious they did. There is Rafael Palmeiro, who put such an emphatic and almost convincing “period!” at the end of his claim on Capitol Hill that he never used steroids, and then a year later tests positive and completely disgraces himself into retirement. There are the handful of players who have been suspended since for violating the league’s banned substances policy. First of all, anyone who uses them now is an idiot, especially if they’re stupid enough to get caught. And before you ask, NO, I do not believe it’s okay as long as you don’t get caught. Unlike them, I possess integrity. But I digress… but the fact that the names of those who have been suspended escape me just shows that they are merely extras in the play known as Baseball’s Steroid Era, starring diva extraordinaire Barry Bonds.

The reason Bonds is and forever will be Public Enemy #1 in this regard is because nobody else was chasing THE elite record in all of baseball, and perhaps all of sports, thereby bringing all the media attention on himself (where, in his mind, it belongs, since baseball and life in general are all about Barry, after all).

There will eventually be irrefutable proof that Bonds used/uses steroids. The evidence that is out there now already shows he did/does (in my mind and in the minds of countless others), but eventually there will be something- a positive test, someone coming forward, whatever- that will finally show all the lambs who still think he’s innocent the truth. Of course, even then there will still be those people who don’t find cheating wrong and will still think he’s the greatest ever, but then, every village needs an idiot or two. Hell, it might be sooner than later. Supposedly, the Senate commission that has been investigating all things doping in baseball will be publishing their findings as early as next month, and the buzz is that there will be names named. Lots of names. Over 100, they say. Keep denying, BB… you’ll go down eventually.

Hank Aaron will always be baseball’s Home Run King until a legitimate hitter hits 756. Until then, whatever number Bonds finishes up with will, in my mind, forever be an imaginary number.

November 3, 2007 - Posted by Johann | baseball, stupid people | , | 5 Comments

5 Comments »

  1. Marc Ecko pulled that stunt because he is a publicity whore.

    I think Bonds is a cheater, but I also think branding that ball with an asterisk is highly insulting. I don’t blame Bonds one bit for getting upset.

    I also wouldn’t blame him for skipping his Hall induction (he was a HoFer before he started taking steroids) if the Hall decides to display the ball. It would be doubly insulting if they did.

    I don’t think the Hall will put it on display, though. They probably have slightly more tact and taste than does Marc Ecko.

    I for one can’t wait until the Mitchell report comes out. I’m dying to see who gets outed as steroid cheaters *coughClemenscough*

    Oh, Ted Kennedy, by the way.

    Comment by Anonymous Communist | November 4, 2007 | Reply

  2. Just a quick comment and AC’s comment:

    I agree with AC that it would be insulting if the Hall were displaying the ball with an asterisk. But then I don’t really care if BB gets insulted. It would be well deserved. He’s been insulting Baseball Fans for years with his denials.

    However, it would be in very poor taste for the HoF to display the marked ball. After all, the Baseball Hall of Fame, as well as the Game it represents, is an American Institution. Such negativity should be ignored. The Hall should refuse to accept the ball under any condition, as well as keep BB out of it’s hallowed halls.

    Comment by SpringfieldZebra | November 4, 2007 | Reply

  3. Okay, I get the point. Sheeesh. My disdain for Bonds apparently has overthrown my judgment.

    Zebra, you commented that it would be in poor taste for the HoF to display the marked ball. Personally, I think it is in poor taste to display a (representative) ball period for the same reason you listed. I defer to your last sentence; they should keep the ball as well as Bonds out of the Hall due to the aforementioned American Institution and negativity reasons. It would be a completely disrespectful slap in the face to baseball fans (especially those few who still believe in integrity) to glorify Bonds and the entire “Steroid Era” at all, or at the very least, without some sort of caveat at least somewhat explaining and denouncing the whole PED situation. Otherwise, that sends the message that cheating is acceptable, even when you get caught.

    AnonCom, I understand your comments and, after applying some rational thinking, I can’t say I don’t at least somewhat agree, but at least with respect to Bonds himself, I don’t give two shits if he gets insulted by anything. Judging from previous conversations you and I have had, I know you’ll blast me for this, but if they enshrine him, then that says to me they’ll enshrine anyone without concern for “‘crimes’ against the sport”, which means they have no choice to enshrine Pete Rose. I know you consider Rose’s gambling a far worse ‘crime’ than steroid use (and that is still inconceivable to me), but I just don’t see how they could allow Bonds in but not Rose. I’m not saying Rose’s gambling or his decade-long denial thereof wasn’t wrong by ANY stretch of the imagination, but I can’t see how they justify banning Rose yet they’ll continue to kiss Bonds’ ass and enshrine him, playing right into his “I’m bigger than baseball” mindset.

    Bonds could very well have broken Aaron’s record without taking steroids, and could very well have been a HoF’er without taking steroids, but integrity is integrity. Either consider it as a factor or else go solely by on-field achievements with absolutely no consideration for character or lack thereof. There again, Rose’s all-time hits record is far more impressive to me than Bonds’ single-season and home-run records, in that both of Bonds’ records were achieved through the use of PED’s. At least with Rose’s gambling, he didn’t throw games he actually played in, or didn’t tell his players to throw games he managed (and bet on). Just seems more than a tad hypocritical to ostracize one but not the other.

    Still, in reference to Bonds himself, f*ck him, and if he has been, is, or will be insulted by anything that has happened, is happening, or will happen, tough shit. It is all well justified. He brought this entire situation upon himself. Be careful what you wish for, Barry.

    But I do fully agree with you that it will be quite interesting to see who gets outed by the Mitchell report. There are several players I desperately hope are on that list, as well as several I desperately hope aren’t. And I have to at least partially agree in that I would be at least a little shocked not to hear Clemens’ name mentioned in some capacity.

    Comment by Johann | November 4, 2007 | Reply

  4. SO, Johann…do you think A-Rod’s name will be on Mitchell’s list? If it is, will you saddened or gladdened? Or if it is not, same question? Just curious.

    Personally, I think A-Rod is an egotisical D*ck head. But I’m still hoping he’s clean, if for no other reason than I think he will smash BB’s record* if he stays healthy. And smashing BB’s record* would be a good thing!!

    Comment by SpringfieldZebra | November 5, 2007 | Reply

  5. Will A-Rod’s name will be on the Mitchell list? I honestly don’t know if it will or not. Ultimately, I don’t even know if I think it will be or not.

    First off, I concur 100% that he is an egotistical dickhead. (It’s okay, you can say “dickhead” here!) That being said, even though he’s obviously in it for money and the money alone, I’ve always rather liked him, for some reason. Then he went to the Yankees, and by definition was to be hated with the fury of 1000 demons. Now that he and the Evil Baseball Empire have parted ways, I am back to inexplicably liking him again. Fickle, yes, but such is life regarding the Yankees; sue me.

    I agree with you in that I really hope he is “clean”, for exactly the same reason. The record* must be eradicated for posterity’s sake and for the sake of what little integrity is left in baseball. In my eyes, the record (note the absence of the asterisk) is still and will forever be 755 until a legitimate hitter breaks it (whether A-Rod or whomever), but to silence the Bonds supporters and those to whom it doesn’t matter that he cheated to achieve his record*, I will be thrilled to see Bonds’ record* crushed, whatever final number* he winds up with at the end of his long illustrious* Hall-of-Fame* career*.

    Again, as long as it is crushed by a legitimate (i.e. clean i.e. steroid free) hitter.

    So to answer the question, I will be extremely saddened–as well as at least somewhat shocked, frankly–to see A-Rod wind up getting outed by the Mitchell findings. Dickhead or not, I really hope he isn’t one of the cheaters simply because, if he IS, I’m not sure we’ll ever see Bonds’ record* go down, and that would truly be a tragedy.

    Comment by Johann | November 5, 2007 | Reply


Leave a comment